|
Technical Notes - Helicopter Electromagnetics
Fugro's Coplanar Coil Convention
At the end of 1998, Fugro Airborne Surveys
changed the way we normalise the DIGHEMV coplanar measurements.
This change brought us into conformity with the convention
employed by other helicopter EM systems. This change has
the effect of doubling the perceived coplanar signal strength:
for example what was 100 ppm (parts per million) signal
will now become 200 ppm. This change has no effect at all
on the quality of our data.
The most obvious effect of Fugro converting
to this normalisation procedure for the coplanar coils is
an apparent doubling of our noise and drift statistics.
This change is exactly offset by a doubling of the signal
for all responses, both background and anomalies. Hence,
there is no change in the Signal to Noise ratio, and no
effective reduction in the high quality of data collected
by a Fugro survey.
Fugro Airborne Surveys can archive data
for clients in either normalisation standard. There is no
change to the coaxial data. It will be the same as always.
The Details
All of the major HEM survey systems normalise
the measured signal from the earth to the transmitted primary
field. But there is more than one way to do this:
-
We assume that all transmitter coils (Tx) generate
the same primary field P (at the transmitter). We
can call the measured primary field strength from
the vertical coaxial Tx kP at the vertical coaxial
receiver coil (Figure 1, Right). (The plane of the
coil is vertical, and perpendicular to the axis of
the bird.) If so, then the primary measured at the
horizontal coplanar receiver coil (Rx) from the coplanar
Tx will be kP/2 (Figure 1, Left).
- Each transmitted field generates secondary response
from a homogeneous halfspace - the earth. If the secondary
from the earth is S from the coplanar Tx, then the response
from the vertical coaxial Tx will be S/2.

Figure 1: Coil Pairs and EM Fields
Because frequency domain systems measure
in the presence of the primary field, the secondary response
is normalised to the primary, typically in parts per million
(ppm). For the coaxial coil pair, the normalised secondary
response is (S/2) / kP. We can call this 1ppm. For the coplanar
pair, if the response is normalised to the primary at
the receiver we get S / (kP/2)=4ppm.
However, by geophysical theory, the absolute
response of a layered halfspace to a horizontal coplanar
coil is only twice that of a vertical coaxial coil transmitting
the same field. (The rest of the 4:1 difference is in the
normalisation.) Standard DIGHEM systems applied a ½
factor to the coplanar data to define the halfspace signal
as 2ppm, to keep the ratio of coplanar to coaxial measured
responses from the halfspace matched to geophysical theory.
Neither method of normalisation has an
inherent advantage. However, many of Fugro Airborne Surveys's
clients who were modelling DighemV data for layered earth
responses requested that Fugro use the method of normalisation
to the primary field at the receiver, which is a more common
standard for electronic and geophysical modelling applications.
Greg Hodges, Chief Geophysicist, 2001
|