|
Technical Notes - Helicopter Electromagnetics
Gridding of Resistivity Data
Often there are requests that apparent resistivity data
be gridded with minimum curvature algorithms. For this discussion,
minimum curvature is assumed to fit to the data a two-dimensional
polynomial surface, shaped to have a minimum mathematical
curvature (maximum radius curves). This algorithm is commonly
used to grid magnetic data, for which it is assumed to provide
the closest fit to the actual shape of the smoothly varying
magnetic (potential) field. However, this mathematical shape
is not the best fit to apparent resistivity data.
The difference lies in the fundamental difference in the
parameter being displayed by gridding. Total magnetic field
is a measure of the earth's magnetic field over the area
that has been surveyed. It is not a direct measure of an
actual rock parameter. Measured at any distance from the
rock, the field will vary smoothly, with no step discontinuities.
The measurement will vary with distance from the source
of the anomaly, and with the shape of the inducing field
(as magnetic anomalies change between the Arctic and equator).
Apparent resistivity, on the other hand, is an approximation
of the actual physical property of the rock and it can change
abruptly. For example, the apparent resistivity change at
the interface between two rock types would form a step discontinuity.
The measurement taken is, in theory, independent of the
distance from which it is measured or the shape of the inducing
field. In principle, the magnetic parameter most comparable
to apparent resistivity is the magnetic susceptibility -
a rock parameter that should not change with the measurement
method.
Because the apparent resistivity can change abruptly,
the profile or grid of the measurements can not be properly
defined by a minimum curvature (smooth) profile or surface.
Fugro normally uses an Akima spline, which fits closely
to the data with roughly straight segments between data
points, and short wavelength smooth curves between straight
segments. The high sampling density along the survey lines
relative to the cross-line spacing, allows us to employ
linear splining to these data points.
Greg Hodges, Chief Geophysicist, 1999
|