|
Technical Papers - Airborne Electromagnetics
Application of a modified GEOTEM system to reconnaissance exploration for kimberlites in the Point Lake area, NWT, Canada
Richard Smith and Peter Annan, Jean Lemieux and Rolf N. Pedersen, Fugro Airborne Surveys
2060 Walkley Road, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1G 3P5
Abstract
Airborne geophysical surveying with electromagnetic (EM) and magnetic methods is an effective reconnaissance exploration tool for kimberlite pipes because the target can have an associated EM and magnetic anomaly. The EM response of kimberlite pipes is most often attributed to weathering alteration in a near-surface layer, whereas the magnetic response is attributed to magnetite and ilmenite within the deeper unweathered kimberlite pipe. The discrete shape of kimberlite diatremes results in an easily identifiable anomaly pattern. Diamondiferous kimberlites have recently been found in the Northwest Territories (NWT) of Canada, an area glaciated in the Pleistocene and therefore devoid of a strongly weathered zone. By configuring the GEOTEM airborne EM system to operate at high frequencies (270 Hz) and to take measurements while the transmitter is switched on, weakly conductive bodies may be detected because there is an adequate contrast with the surrounding highly resistive country rock. System modifications also allow the magnetic field to be sampled at an altitude of only 73 m instead of 120 m and ten times per second instead of once a second. This allows much better definition of weak, small magnetic anomalies. Data sets from two test areas (Point Lake and Willy Nilly, near Lac de Gras, NWT) demonstrate the effectiveness of the airborne system for reconnaissance surveying.
Presented at the International Workshop on Airborne Electromagnetics Methods, Tucson, AZ, September 13-16, 1993.
GEOPHYSICS, VOL. 61, NO. 1 (JANUARY-FEBRUARY 1996); P. 82-92, 14 FIGS. Manuscript received by the Editor February 28, 1994; revised manuscript received September 15, 1994. © 1996 Society of Exploration Geophysicists. All rights reserved.
For a paper copy with better reproductions of Figures 6 and 11, and better colour images for Figures 7,8,9,12,13 and 14, please email Richard Smith. Also see the Point Lake Case Study.
Download Paper (951 Kb)
|